Oy.

Share

Share

Sunday, 11 May 2014
no image

0
Credit to Abujade

Nathan: Yo.

Holden: You’re alive? We’re alive?

Nathan: Apparently.

Holden: I feel like Jesus.

Nathan: Except this blog was dead for a tad longer than three days. But I have a topic I think really needs to be talked about.

Holden: Hit me.

Nathan: Heard about the kidnapping in Nigeria?


Nathan: I believe the term is “slacktivism.” Also you forgot sex slavery.

Holden: I always forget sex slavery.

Nathan: ...Right. Anyway, this situation made me angrier than I’ve felt in a long time. And you know that a lot of things about the world piss me off.

Holden: Most. You almost severed my head for flicking a crutch off your deck.
     
Nathan: Hey man, I had an ashtray in the other room...

Holden: Ashtrays save the world.

Nathan: They do more than the UN.

Holden:Shots fired. Let the rant commence.

Nathan: But seriously. I can’t think of a situation better suited for UN intervention than this one. It perfectly meets the criteria set forth by the ICISS’s Responsibility to Protect Project — written in response to a UN request — where it states:
“Where a population is suffering serious harm, as a result of internal war, insurgency, repression or state failure, and the state in question is unwilling or unable to halt or avert it, the principle of non-intervention yields to the international responsibility to protect.”



This is repression through insurgency. The Boko Haram problem is a threat not just to Nigeria and Western Africa, but to people aspiring for education throughout the world. We’re setting a precedent that the international community will not act in the face of such heinous crimes against education, progress, and humanity.

Holden: Why focus so intently on Boko Haram as opposed to the gluttony of other fucked up shit in this world?

Nathan: Partially because this is a conflict the international community could end swiftly with sufficient force, but mainly because of the message they send to others who aspire to learn and improve the world through their ingenuity. These kidnapped Nigerian girls exhibited extreme bravery getting an education in such a hostile environment, and then, right as they are about to go to university, they are kidnapped, to be sex slaves for these monsters. Not to mention the 10s of thousands of innocent people Boko Haram have slaughtered in Nigeria. Makes my blood boil.

Holden: You’re getting at the idea that education is the all-encompassing medicine of the world.

Nathan: Exactly. Every problem, from racism, to economic parity, to terrorism, to ensuring future generations have a livable planet...

Holden: To baby seals and world peace and immorality and worldwide nirvana!

Nathan: You know what I’m saying. Most of the problems in this world are rooted in ignorance or miseducation.

Holden: Sure. But how do we apply this magical remedy? Do we rub it on the affected area one to two times a day? Does it come in pill form?

Nathan: We could start by pledging to protect those who pursue education throughout the world. And paying teachers what they’re worth wouldn’t hurt either.

Holden: Decent salaried teachers aren’t going to bring back the kidnapped girls. Do we have to improve our own domestic education systems before improving others’? Is it our responsibility to improve global education?

Nathan: Why do they have to be mutually exclusive? And sometimes, just providing a safe space to share ideas and learn is enough.

Holden: Is that what education is — a safe space to share ideas?

Nathan: It’s a launching pad. Progress will come in time. And in Boko Haram we have an opportunity to show that the international community will not tolerate these kind of actions so people around the world don’t have to be frightened of broadening their mind. They don’t have to become masters of physics,* but they should have the option to, without being worried about being sold into sex slavery because some extremists misinterpreted a book.

Holden: Of course. On this we certainly don’t disagree. But step back a bit. What exactly is the magical ointment of education made out of? What defines this abstract term “education?”

Nathan: Well, a start is teaching science that is verified by empirical evidence. Simply gaining an understanding of the natural world we live in can change a person’s outlook
and actions dramatically.

Holden: How does such an education system get imposed? And is our education necessarily, objectively superior to other forms?

Nathan: It’s not about imposition or objective superiorty. It’s about ensuring those who are making an attempt — however that may be, there is no one right way to teach — can do so without fearing for their and their families’ lives.

Holden: That’s a beautiful point.

Nathan: If only it were a reality.

Holden: Oy.

This post dedicated to our loving mothers, Jeri Taylor and Dalia Taft. We wouldn’t be here without you.

*Which is what the exam the Nigerian girls were taking was on.
Read More
Sunday, 2 March 2014
Introducing ShlomoShunn to the World

0

Nathan: Did you read Indigo’s Sex Appeals article on consent?


Holden: Yes, definitely did. Thought it was far too extreme. it’s underlying message — that consent is important — is on the mark but the lengths she went were a little ridiculous. Asking permission for a kiss? Really?


Nathan: I  pretty much agree, but what caught my attention was the comments section. Specifically a comment made by a certain ShlomoShunn.


Holden: You don’t say, a certain ShlomoShunn? What’d he have to say?


Nathan: From the top. (1)



Holden: My first thought: this guy’s a genius. That second sentence is a masterpiece.


Nathan: A troll among trolls?


Holden: Oscar-worthy. He begins with a grammatical error — “Everyone know” — that suggests either troll or zealot too focused with a message to bother with plebeian worries like grammar.  


Nathan: Or anyone who doesn’t proofread. But that first line is pretty real. Anyway, there’s more—


Holden: —Hold on, I’m not done with this paragraph.  He then uses a common trope — that women want men to read their minds — and twists it in the most beautifully perverse manner. He screams at us with the thoughts that we pretend we can’t think.


Nathan: I mean, it sets a terrible generalization about women, especially the last line, assuming he knows the ins and out of most females’ head in that respect is ridiculous and offensive. Well done troll. I almost got worked up.


Holden: Fully agreed. Its ridiculousness is not up to debate but I think the undercurrent, the creepy and undeniable humanity we can see in it, is fascinating. You said something about more?



Nathan: So let’s see, he’s trying to make the argument of reverse sexism to piss people off.


Holden: Yeah. A fairly traditional trope — similar to many of the libertarian special rights claims. But the devices he employs are impressive. It’s blatantly absurd but there’s just enough to give off a whiff of sincerity.


Nathan: Like, maybe he’s not a troll?  


Holden: Exactly. Which makes him an even better troll.


Nathan: Uh... you lost me. If someone actually holds these opinions and isn’t just trolling that’s sad. How does that make him an even better troll?


Holden: The fact that there is a discussion of whether he is trolling or not is what makes him such an effective troll. There’s layers to this shit! Trolling is an art that makes us question sincerity, makes us wonder to what extremes our minds can go.


Nathan: Well figuring out the level of sincerity will decide if I’m going to laugh — because he’s a clever troll — or cry — because humanity is fucked if people like this breed.


Holden: But we can’t figure it out! It’s Roland Barthes, it’s the Death of the Author. We’re forced to consume the ‘performance’ as is without considering authorial identity or intention. We have to recognize the array of possibility. You should laugh and cry.


Nathan: I can’t combine the two. I need to know if he’s one or the other.


Holden: Which is the beauty of this beautiful (2) post by the legend ShlomoShunn.


Nathan: Well let’s see if there’s more. He has a Disqus account with… Shit. Over 1600 comments that range from monstrously insensitive and sexist — expected —   to dangerously anti-semitic — unexpected — to surprisingly, disturbingly religious — totally unexpected. I’m leaning toward person with a depressingly destructive world view and way too much free time. So, I guess sad?


Holden: 1600 comments — and they’re all, it seems, from within the past month or two. The output. This guy’s the Lil B of hate. But hey, he’s witty.


Nathan: *crickets* Should we even bother going back to the original comment? The thing is so long and awful...


Holden: This guy is the Scorsese of Disqus trolls; I present to you his Goodfellas:


Nathan: “the bucking broncos they become when Mandingo pile-drives their fundaments” ? Maybe this guy is a troll, maybe he is the Disqus Scorsese. Which masterpiece would this be? It’s strikingly offensive on multiple levels.



Holden: That’s Raging Bull and the Departed wrapped in one. A true genius.


Nathan: More like a shmuck with a smart mouth.


Holden: Oy.


(1) You can read the comment in all its glory without our commentary right here.

(2) Someone’s stoned.


To ShlomoShunn:

Thanks for the inspiring comment. Looking forward to your response.

Also if anyone else would like to weigh in please do.


Read More
==